Mar 3, 2026 at 7:21 AM 6 signals analysed No manual reviews · fully automatedTrust Signal Breakdown high 23 sub-signals across 6 dimensions
Vulnerability & Safety ×0.25 0.0 CVEs, dependency health, and supply chain integrity
0 of 3 sub-signals with data
Known CVEs no data —
Weight redistributed to sub-signals with data
Dependency Health no data —
Weight redistributed to sub-signals with data
Supply Chain no data —
Weight redistributed to sub-signals with data
Operational Reliability ×0.15 3.8 Uptime, latency, error rates, and incident history
4 of 4 sub-signals with data
Uptime 35% 5.0
100.00% over 4 checks
via Health checks
Response Latency 25% 5.0
p99: 131ms, p50: 127ms
via Health checks
Error Rate 20% 1.0
25.00% error rate (1/4)
via Health checks
Incident History 20% 3.0
2 incidents in last 90 days
via Incidents table
Maintenance Activity ×0.15 3.6 Commit recency, release cadence, issue response, CI/CD
4 of 4 sub-signals with data
Commit Recency 30% 4.0
via GitHub
Release Cadence 25% 4.0
via GitHub
Issue Response 20% 1.0
via GitHub
CI/CD Presence 25% 5.0
via GitHub Actions
Adoption ×0.15 1.0 Downloads, stars, dependents, and growth trajectory
1 of 4 sub-signals with data
Download Volume no data —
Weight redistributed to sub-signals with data
GitHub Stars 100% 1.0
85 stars
via GitHub
Dependent Packages no data —
Weight redistributed to sub-signals with data
Growth Trend no data —
Weight redistributed to sub-signals with data
Transparency ×0.15 3.5 License, documentation, security policy, changelog
4 of 4 sub-signals with data
Open Source 30% 2.0
Public repo but no license detected
via GitHub
Documentation 25% 5.0
Docs site present with comprehensive README (>2000 bytes + examples)
via GitHub
Security Policy 20% 2.0
No SECURITY.md found
via GitHub
Changelog 25% 5.0
CHANGELOG.md present and releases exist
via GitHub
Publisher Trust ×0.15 3.3 Track record, org maturity, community standing
4 of 4 sub-signals with data
Track Record 30% 2.5
Internal: 1.0 (0 services), External: 2.5 (107 followers, 389 stars)
via Fabric index
Org Maturity 30% 5.0
User account, 13.1 years old
via GitHub
Community Standing 20% 4.0
68 public repositories
via GitHub
Cross-Platform 20% 1.0
Present on 1 platform(s): github
via Registry scan
About this scoreScored across 23 sub-signals in 6 dimensions Scoring engine v1 (beta) — actively being expanded Phase 1: Core sub-signal architecture (live) Phase 2: Permission scope & expanded collection (in progress)
Trust Assessment AI Assessment
A proxy tool for composing multiple MCP servers into one unified endpoint. Scale your AI tools by load balancing requests across multiple MCP servers, similar to how Nginx works for web servers.
Package Availability (30d)
100.00%
p50: 127ms · p99: 131ms
Avg Latency
99ms
averaged across 30d health checks
Weekly Downloads
—
no package registry data
Transparency & Compliance 3/5 passed
Incidents & Alerts last 90 days
Score History 4 snapshots
Feb 24 Mar 2
Data Sources 6 indexed
◎
OSV.dev CVE database · vulnerability scanning for npm & PyPI packages
◈
GitHub API Commits, issues, releases, repo metadata, transparency checks
⬡
npm Registry Package metadata, weekly downloads, maintainers, dependencies
⬡
PyPI Package metadata, weekly downloads, dependency tree
△
HTTP Health Checks 15-min pings · uptime, latency, status monitoring
◎
PyPI Stats Download statistics and trends
Version History
VERSION RELEASED
Are you the publisher? Claim this profile to unlock deeper evaluation, real-time monitoring, and trust signals that help agents discover your service.
Claim Provider Report Issue
Share this Trust Score Generate a scorecard image optimised for X, LinkedIn and other social platforms.
⬇ Download Score Card