Score capped to 2.99 (raw score: 3.24) due to insufficient data in one or more signals. The composite is held at caution level until all signals can be fully evaluated.
Mar 5, 2026 at 8:04 AM6 signals analysedNo manual reviews · fully automated
Trust Signal Breakdown
high23 sub-signals across 6 dimensions
CVEs, dependency health, and supply chain integrity
1 of 3 sub-signals with data
Known CVEs100%5.0
No known CVEs
via OSV.dev
Dependency Healthno data—
Weight redistributed to sub-signals with data
Supply Chainno data—
Weight redistributed to sub-signals with data
Uptime, latency, error rates, and incident history
Docs site present with comprehensive README (>2000 bytes + examples)
via GitHub
Security Policy20%2.0
No SECURITY.md found
via GitHub
Changelog25%4.0
Releases exist but no CHANGELOG.md
via GitHub
Track record, org maturity, community standing
4 of 4 sub-signals with data
Track Record30%0.0
via Fabric index
Org Maturity30%0.0
via GitHub
Community Standing20%0.0
via GitHub
Cross-Platform20%0.0
via Registry scan
About this score
Scored across 23 sub-signals in 6 dimensionsScoring engine v1 (beta) — actively being expandedPhase 1: Core sub-signal architecture (live)Phase 2: Permission scope & expanded collection (in progress)
Trust AssessmentAI Assessment
– A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation that connects Large Language Models (LLMs) to GIS operations using GIS libraries, enabling AI assistants to perform accurate geospatial operations and transformations.